Quality gate for AI content · for content teams
Block content that won't get cited
AI is writing your content. Nobody is checking it before it ships. Dokeo is the quality gate for content teams shipping at volume. 34 checks, 5ms, PASS/FAIL. Not another keyword editor, not a post-mortem dashboard.
Google
Dokeo is a pre-publish quality gate: per its own scoring methodology [S1], every scan runs the same deterministic checks used in production, across all 17 supported content types [S2], with no black-box review.
How is this different from an editor checklist?
A checklist is judgment calls a human still has to apply. Dokeo runs the same deterministic checks on every draft and returns one of five severities - consistent across writers, freelancers, and LLM output alike.
- The same draft always returns the same verdict, safe to block a CI pipeline on.
- Every FAIL names the specific check that failed and why.
- 100 free scans a month, no credit card, same gate as production.
Sources: [S1] Dokeo scoring methodology, /docs/checks. [S2] Dokeo pricing, /pricing. Current as of 2026.
If this is your week, you care a lot
- ✗Editors can't review every draft when volume outpaces QA
- ✗Surfer / Clearscope help writers - they don't stop a bad piece from shipping
- ✗You invest in SEO, then ChatGPT and Perplexity never cite you
- ✗Two posts cannibalize the same keyword and nobody catches it until traffic drops
What the gate gives you
- One five-severity verdict before publish - not another score to argue about
- SEO + AEO + GEO in a single pass, including your own published corpus
- Works after any writer or LLM - Surfer, ChatGPT, freelancers, all of them
- Optional webhooks and CI when ops is ready; useful from day one in the browser
Different job from Surfer or Clearscope
They help you write. Dokeo decides if it ships. Keep your brief tools; add the gate after the draft is done. Many teams do both.