Perplexity is the AI search engine most aggressively reshaping how content gets discovered. Dokeo scores whether your content is structured, fresh, and credible enough to be cited by Perplexity - and ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.
Anyone searching the web with an AI-first interface.
Content teams whose traffic increasingly comes from Perplexity, ChatGPT, and Claude citations.
Perplexity is a search engine. Dokeo is the optimisation layer that makes your content more likely to be cited by Perplexity (and its peers). Dokeo checks for the structural signals AI search engines use to pick citation candidates.
| Feature | vs Perplexity | Dokeo |
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | Search the web | Make your content citation-ready |
| Generates content | ✗ (only synthesises answers) | ✗ (only scores content) |
| Citation-readiness checks | ✗ | ✓ |
| Inline highlights of gaps | ✗ | ✓ |
AI search engines favour content that is recent (under 3 months old), structured (clear H2s, lists, tables), authoritative (cited sources), and direct (answers the query in the first 50 words). Dokeo scores all of these.
| Feature | vs Perplexity | Dokeo |
|---|---|---|
| Recency signal | ✗ | ✓ (publish date freshness check) |
| Structure signal | ✗ | ✓ (heading hierarchy + list density) |
| Authoritative sources | ✗ | ✓ (citation presence + diversity) |
| Direct answer early | ✗ | ✓ (first-paragraph snippet check) |
Citation tracking is a separate feature on the Team plan. The core scoring product tells you whether your content is structured for citation - tracking is the next layer.
Yes. Traditional SEO optimised for Google's blue links. AI search optimisation optimises for being cited inline by an answer engine. Different signals, different checks, different score.
No tool can guarantee that. Dokeo significantly increases the probability by enforcing the structural signals AI search engines look for. The rest depends on the query, your authority, and how often the model crawls.